Comments on: Snippets http://electrolicious.com/2004/02/snippets Daily affirmations of a word mercenary Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:20:47 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: dena http://electrolicious.com/2004/02/snippets#comment-3603 dena Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:48:00 +0000 #comment-3603 ariel-- it's been a dog's age since i've been in touch (though i do see terra from time to time), but i'm recently returned from stumping for edwards in nh (feels like recently, at least)-- and i think he's great. in the race for the right reasons, scores high on the connects-with-voters polls, is a media fave and has been touted as (whether or not this is a compliment) "the greatest politician of his generation." anyhow, i'm sure this is too late but good luck with the book proposal and all. cheers. ariel– it’s been a dog’s age since i’ve been in touch (though i do see terra from time to time), but i’m recently returned from stumping for edwards in nh (feels like recently, at least)– and i think he’s great. in the race for the right reasons, scores high on the connects-with-voters polls, is a media fave and has been touted as (whether or not this is a compliment) “the greatest politician of his generation.” anyhow, i’m sure this is too late but good luck with the book proposal and all. cheers.

]]> By: sean http://electrolicious.com/2004/02/snippets#comment-3602 sean Fri, 06 Feb 2004 20:37:35 +0000 #comment-3602 Re: Kucinich, the 15% rule is how the Iowa caucuses worked as well, and Kucinich was still able to get delegates there in spite of his low poll numbers. Especially if you're in a more urban area right now, Kucinich's support will be stronger; in fact, Kucinich and Edwards had a kind of "gentlemens' agreement" in Iowa where they swapped delegates where each candidate's support would be stronger (Kucinich in urban areas, Edwards in rural areas). Besides, with Edwards' win in SC, I doubt he'll miss the second round anywhere, so you can stump for Kucinich in the first round, then if he doesn't get enough support you can always move over to Edwards in the second. Re: Kucinich, the 15% rule is how the Iowa caucuses worked as well, and Kucinich was still able to get delegates there in spite of his low poll numbers. Especially if you’re in a more urban area right now, Kucinich’s support will be stronger; in fact, Kucinich and Edwards had a kind of “gentlemens’ agreement” in Iowa where they swapped delegates where each candidate’s support would be stronger (Kucinich in urban areas, Edwards in rural areas). Besides, with Edwards’ win in SC, I doubt he’ll miss the second round anywhere, so you can stump for Kucinich in the first round, then if he doesn’t get enough support you can always move over to Edwards in the second.

]]> By: katherine http://electrolicious.com/2004/02/snippets#comment-3601 katherine Fri, 06 Feb 2004 20:05:44 +0000 #comment-3601 none say bent tip - are yours slanted or pointed tweers? :) K none say bent tip - are yours slanted or pointed tweers? :) K

]]> By: :: jozjozjoz :: http://electrolicious.com/2004/02/snippets#comment-3600 :: jozjozjoz :: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 19:19:19 +0000 #comment-3600 Now I have to go try those tweezers out. Now I have to go try those tweezers out.

]]> By: Ariel http://electrolicious.com/2004/02/snippets#comment-3599 Ariel Thu, 05 Feb 2004 17:29:15 +0000 #comment-3599 Sean, Kucinich is just barely still in the race. <I>That's</i> what happened to my support of him. Within the Washington caucus system, if your candidate doesn't have 15% of the group's support, then you have to vote for someone else. And Katherine, they are bent-tip tweezers from <a href="http://www.sephora.com/">Sephora</a> in Marseille. Sean, Kucinich is just barely still in the race. That’s what happened to my support of him. Within the Washington caucus system, if your candidate doesn’t have 15% of the group’s support, then you have to vote for someone else.

And Katherine, they are bent-tip tweezers from Sephora in Marseille.

]]>