<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grumble</title>
	<atom:link href="http://electrolicious.com/2004/05/grumble/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://electrolicious.com/2004/05/grumble</link>
	<description>Daily affirmations of a word mercenary</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ariel</title>
		<link>http://electrolicious.com/2004/05/grumble#comment-4334</link>
		<dc:creator>Ariel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2004 17:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-4334</guid>
		<description>Tumbleweed, it's only not displaying because Jennifer (who's helping me install the new commenting features) is fiddling with that. TypeKey standard is NOT to have to fill that info in again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tumbleweed, it&#8217;s only not displaying because Jennifer (who&#8217;s helping me install the new commenting features) is fiddling with that. TypeKey standard is NOT to have to fill that info in again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tumbleweed</title>
		<link>http://electrolicious.com/2004/05/grumble#comment-4333</link>
		<dc:creator>Tumbleweed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2004 23:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-4333</guid>
		<description>Okay, testing, testing.

BTW - weirdness after logging in via Typekey - it refreshed Electrolicious to an april archive.

Okay, so logging in via Typekey doesn't autofill the 'name' spot? Or the email spot? And they're still required to post? Irritation.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, testing, testing.</p>
<p>BTW - weirdness after logging in via Typekey - it refreshed Electrolicious to an april archive.</p>
<p>Okay, so logging in via Typekey doesn&#8217;t autofill the &#8216;name&#8217; spot? Or the email spot? And they&#8217;re still required to post? Irritation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ariel</title>
		<link>http://electrolicious.com/2004/05/grumble#comment-4332</link>
		<dc:creator>Ariel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2004 22:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-4332</guid>
		<description>Yeah, definitely some weirdness with TypeKey...for instance, non-TypeKey registered user comments are still displaying without approval.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, definitely some weirdness with TypeKey&#8230;for instance, non-TypeKey registered user comments are still displaying without approval.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tismera</title>
		<link>http://electrolicious.com/2004/05/grumble#comment-4331</link>
		<dc:creator>Tismera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2004 21:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-4331</guid>
		<description>Oh I feel the same way about valuing comments. And I know that by knocking off the comment board I do turn down the level of communication between my 'webpage' audience and myself. 

I really don`t want too do that, but then again, I also run a mailing list for my work and that tends to get better and more interesting critical responses for me anyways. Who knows? Maybe it`s just me, or maybe it`s the nature of the medium? Mail being... MAIL, while some webpages (my own included) are almost impersonal. Because some of the time to the people who download it or to the people who read it and run? Writing and art on the net is just so easy and readily available that it may almost seem detached from the artist itself or the webpage. Does that make sense? 

I always feel bad when I go around on the net and see good art or good writing and don`t leave a comment. (PS: You`re a very good writer and I like your work, and if I`ve never said it before, I`m a cad and I apologize wholeheartedly). 

And consequently while I visit many blogs I only like to comment or leave comments on certain one with a more 'friendly' or almost 'personal' atmosphere. Yours is always open and easy going which I like. Some other places I frequent are (Aimee, artist and animator) http://aimee.wyvernweb.com/, (Colony One, Japanese Wunderkind) http://www.din.or.jp/%7Ec-o/ , (Leah The Infectious Texan Blog) www.vacant.cc ,(Genki, the Japanese Martial Artist Super Star Runway Model Philosopher) http://www.genkisudo.com and (Jenny, Canadian Prodigy) http://slashp.diaryland.com/ which I think are all very cool for very different reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh I feel the same way about valuing comments. And I know that by knocking off the comment board I do turn down the level of communication between my &#8216;webpage&#8217; audience and myself. </p>
<p>I really don`t want too do that, but then again, I also run a mailing list for my work and that tends to get better and more interesting critical responses for me anyways. Who knows? Maybe it`s just me, or maybe it`s the nature of the medium? Mail being&#8230; MAIL, while some webpages (my own included) are almost impersonal. Because some of the time to the people who download it or to the people who read it and run? Writing and art on the net is just so easy and readily available that it may almost seem detached from the artist itself or the webpage. Does that make sense? </p>
<p>I always feel bad when I go around on the net and see good art or good writing and don`t leave a comment. (PS: You`re a very good writer and I like your work, and if I`ve never said it before, I`m a cad and I apologize wholeheartedly). </p>
<p>And consequently while I visit many blogs I only like to comment or leave comments on certain one with a more &#8216;friendly&#8217; or almost &#8216;personal&#8217; atmosphere. Yours is always open and easy going which I like. Some other places I frequent are (Aimee, artist and animator) <a href="http://aimee.wyvernweb.com/" rel="nofollow">http://aimee.wyvernweb.com/</a>, (Colony One, Japanese Wunderkind) <a href="http://www.din.or.jp/%7Ec-o/" rel="nofollow">http://www.din.or.jp/%7Ec-o/</a> , (Leah The Infectious Texan Blog) <a href="http://www.vacant.cc" rel="nofollow">http://www.vacant.cc</a> ,(Genki, the Japanese Martial Artist Super Star Runway Model Philosopher) <a href="http://www.genkisudo.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.genkisudo.com</a> and (Jenny, Canadian Prodigy) <a href="http://slashp.diaryland.com/" rel="nofollow">http://slashp.diaryland.com/</a> which I think are all very cool for very different reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://electrolicious.com/2004/05/grumble#comment-4330</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2004 20:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-4330</guid>
		<description>Doesn't the D in 3.0D means it's mainly for the developers, like the mt-blacklist pluginmakers, so they can get ready for the main release?  I'm sure they're working overtime on it, but in the meantime, I guess you get to experience the downside of being an early adopter....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t the D in 3.0D means it&#8217;s mainly for the developers, like the mt-blacklist pluginmakers, so they can get ready for the main release?  I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;re working overtime on it, but in the meantime, I guess you get to experience the downside of being an early adopter&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
