<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MT 3.0D</title>
	<atom:link href="http://electrolicious.com/2004/05/mt_30d/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://electrolicious.com/2004/05/mt_30d</link>
	<description>Daily affirmations of a word mercenary</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://electrolicious.com/2004/05/mt_30d#comment-4300</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2004 03:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-4300</guid>
		<description>Stephanie-

You may already know about this, but there's a threaded comments plugin available for MT.  You can find it &lt;a href="http://mt-plugins.org/archives/entry/threadedcomments.php"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.

It's pretty basic, nothing as complex as the comments in slashcode or scoop, but it's functional. I also don't know if it works with MT3.0 or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephanie-</p>
<p>You may already know about this, but there&#8217;s a threaded comments plugin available for MT.  You can find it <a href="http://mt-plugins.org/archives/entry/threadedcomments.php">here</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty basic, nothing as complex as the comments in slashcode or scoop, but it&#8217;s functional. I also don&#8217;t know if it works with MT3.0 or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://electrolicious.com/2004/05/mt_30d#comment-4299</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2004 21:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-4299</guid>
		<description>you know, I considered upgrading my site, but the whole typekey things seems like too much to expect from readers.  granted, the comments would probably be more meaningful and valuable because only loyal folk would likely create an account, bbut I'm just not a fan of the idea.

now, if they introduced threaded comments, that's a whole different story.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you know, I considered upgrading my site, but the whole typekey things seems like too much to expect from readers.  granted, the comments would probably be more meaningful and valuable because only loyal folk would likely create an account, bbut I&#8217;m just not a fan of the idea.</p>
<p>now, if they introduced threaded comments, that&#8217;s a whole different story.  <img src='http://electrolicious.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ariel</title>
		<link>http://electrolicious.com/2004/05/mt_30d#comment-4298</link>
		<dc:creator>Ariel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2004 19:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-4298</guid>
		<description>Nope, it hasn't changed that much at all. Mainly just the comment moderation features. That said, I support the software, so I upgraded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, it hasn&#8217;t changed that much at all. Mainly just the comment moderation features. That said, I support the software, so I upgraded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paisley</title>
		<link>http://electrolicious.com/2004/05/mt_30d#comment-4297</link>
		<dc:creator>paisley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2004 20:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-4297</guid>
		<description>has it real changed all that much?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>has it real changed all that much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
