I grew up without a scale in the house. My mother threw the scale away when I was 8 years old, because she didn’t want me to ever feel a slave to it like she had as a teen. Fat was a feminist issue, and feeling fat meant caving into patriarchal pressures. I also didn’t have any Barbies growing up because my mom didn’t want me to have a distorted body image. Hey, makes sense to me. I got My Little Ponies, instead … they have stumpy legs and plump bubble butts and are probably a much better body model for little girls. As a result, I grew up with a solid, health body and healthy body image. I’m totally average-bodied: thick, but not fat; strong, not skinny.
However, six-plus years of working as a writer/sedentary lump accelerated my metabolism’s natural decline. Despite a daily yoga practice, I’ve never been an especially active person and having a sedentary career is without a doubt my biggest health liability.
I eat healthy foods. My diet is mostly vegetarian (I eat fish a few times a week) and I eat a lot of Dre’s vegan food. I rarely touch fast food, rarely drink alcohol-soda-starbucks-etc, and my main vices have been sweets, nuts, and oily ethnic foods like Thai and Indian. My diet is infinitely healthier than the Standard American Diet of deep fried everything with a bucket-sized side of carbonated sugar.
Despite all that, though, I’d steadily gained weight for the last five years … three or four pounds a year. I wasn’t terribly overweight, but I could already see how my sedentary lifestyle and eating habits had become the most unhealthy part of my life. And, well, my chin was starting to disappear into my neck.
I started wrestling with myself: I felt unhealthy — and then felt guilty for feeling that way. Was I a victim of the patriarchy? So wait, fighting the patriarchy means stuffing myself? Was I buying into some clucky NOT ME style national weight obsession by feeling like I wasn’t eating right? And wait, since when is eating healthier a national obsession? Americans eat terribly!
I knew that I was eating more food than I needed to, but the mere idea of portion control brought up an enormous set of issues for me. As the feminist daughter of a feminist mother, I’ve always sort of felt like it was my duty not to think about food. Not only a duty — it was something I owed to my best friend who’d suffered through anorexia and bulimia in high school, complete with a month of hospitalization. It was my job to be the one who held down the fort of healthy eating, setting a good example for women who were crushed under the thumb of eating disorders and weight issues.
Mimi Smartypants touched on this issue when she wrote:
My friend and I decided that having the body-image blues is dramatically worse for girls like me and her and, presumably, you, because we are all Bitch and Sassy and Janeane Garofolo and Beauty Myth and Kathleen Hanna, and it is so very Not Punk Rock to have the body-image blues, so then besides feeling like we are hideously deformed we also have to have this extra layer of guilt and shame and not-punk-rockness on top of everything. I am not saying that life is necessarily easier for the non-self-aware, not-so-terribly-cursed-with-a-sense-of-irony, vapid shallow fashion girls. Except that I think maybe I am.
In my mind, the only way to fight eating disorders and the all-too-common feminine weight neurosis was not to think about food or weight at all … I ate HEALTHY food, but the thought of “maybe I should eat less” always felt like it was just around the corner from some sort of Karen Carpenter nightmare, where I suddenly became a neurotic starving skeleton with amenorrhea.
I tried various exercise regimes to try to balance out my sedentary lifestyle but because I’m so solidly muscular, the effect was that I just got bigger. I ran stairs for six months and my ass grew (harder, but bigger!). I lifted weights for almost a year and the result was that my t-shirt sleeves stopped fitting.
Then, someone recommended Weight Watchers.
I know, right? Fucking Weight Watchers? A pay-for-play diet program? Now it wasn’t the feminist in me that balked, it was the conscious consumer. Not only was I a victim of the patriarchy, I’d be a victim of consumer fitness culture! You can’t pay someone to fix your bad habits! And fad diets suck. They’re not healthy.
I can’t deal with the “bad food/food bad” issues that many chronic dieters seem to embody. I think too many women spend their days connecting food with negativity, and it’s just not healthy! Food is good, food nourishes us! Now, is there food that’s healthier? Yes. Is there food that you should eat less of? Sure! But is there bad food? No!
Then I talked to a woman I respected and she explained “It’s not really a diet, it’s a training for how to eat and cook for the rest of your life and not hate it.” Oh, you mean it’s not about special foods you can or can’t eat? It’s just about figuring out how much you can eat in balance with your lifestyle? About being more mindful of the foods you eat and the quantities that you eat them, as it compares with your activity level? Huh. That all made perfect sense.
I signed up for Weight Watchers Online at the beginning of December. I opted not to do the meetings — I was told by a friend of a friend that she found the meetings not especially helpful for people who eat foods like quinoa and tempeh. Plus, doing it online was cheaper.
I started eating less. There weren’t any bad food/food bad issues. Part of why WW has worked for me is that there’s no “bad food.” There’s just food that you can eat more of, and food that you should eat less of. Does that mean I can’t have a grilled cheese sandwich for dinner sometimes? Fuck no! But I learned quickly that having a huge plate of oily Thai food for lunch every day eventually added up. I started learning about how, as a vegetarian, I need to get my protein from things like beans instead of things like, say, cheese.
I refused to buy a scale for the first three months, eschewing WW’s weekly weigh-ins as unhealthy for me. I didn’t want to fixate on a number. I just wanted to appreciate on how I felt, and how my clothes fit. And what do you know! I felt better and my clothes got looser. (I did eventually buy a scale, but it lives in the basement where I’m not tempted to weigh myself. Once a week I go dig it out. Never more often than that.)
I’d talked to Andreas a lot before starting Weight Watchers, just as a sanity check to verbalize my intentions. “I want to learn about how to eat in better balance with my life,” I said. He had to remind me that I’d said this a couple months in, when I started freaking out about how much I was thinking about food.
“You wanted to be more conscious about food, remember?” he said. Ah, that’s right. I did. And being more conscious is healthy. I have this feminist knee-jerk that thinking about food AT ALL equals Victim of Evil Forces. This is, of course, not true.
So I’ve been eating less. And started taking aerobic dance classes instead of yoga classes (although I still have my home yoga practice). And I’ve lost weight. It feels so simple: I’ve been eating less and more consciously, although I’m certainly not deprived. Y’all have seen what I eat for lunch. I eat a lot of good, rich, healthy foods. Less oily noodles and nuts and cheese, sure. But WW encourages eating lots of vegetables and whole grains and high fiber foods — foods I already enjoyed and already knew were good for me.
I do have a couple quibbles with WW. I don’t like how it unintentionally encourages eating “fake” foods like Splenda instead of honey. For me, it seems obvious that it’s better to have a natural, whole food than some sort of chemically fake blech. But whatever: I stick with honey and work around it. The flexibility lets me do that. God knows there are some people on Weight Watchers who, rather than eat a huge bowl full of vegetables opt for three chicken nuggets because that’s what they want. And that’s their choice. It’s cool like that.
With this weight loss has come the realization that part of the issues that were coming up for me with my slow weight gain wasn’t just the increased size and pounds — it was that I felt like I was powerless to do anything about it. When you buy into the logic of thinking about food = victim of patriarchy, there’s a certain loss of control.
Despite the fact that I avoided dieting for years because I thought it would make me a powerless victim of the patriarchy, losing this bit of weight has actually made me get back in touch with my body and its needs and given me a better sense of understanding myself. If I find myself in a state of physical health that I’m not comfortable with again, I know what I need to do. Once I’ve got the tools that work, it’s not that hard. Weight Watchers is nothing compared to those month-long cleanses Dre and I used to do.
The only downside? Some of my favorite clothes have stopped fitting. I had to sacrifice the size 14 lime green pants that were always a little big but reached the point of falling off. This morning I put on my favorite pirate skirt and found that it hung so low on my hips that it was almost obscene. I guess that’s the sad part of slowly losing the 20 pounds extra I’ve slowly accumulated.
Regardless, I’m pretty close now to the weight that my body is healthy at. I’m not meant to be a stick, and my curves are back to the ratios that look good with my build. It’s a nice place to be, and the process of getting here has been pretty enjoyable. I can be an overly cerebral person at times (gee, ya think?), and it’s been nice to focus some attention on my physical vessel, as it were.
Clearly, the fact that I’ve written so many words about this subject points to the fact that regardless of which way you’re coming from, women and food are big issues in this culture. I’ve tried to tip-toe through the mine-field as carefully as possible, and I’ve had some great help from my mother and the women around me who’ve done everything to help me love my body … and it’s been my goal to deal with the process of losing weight in a positive, self-affirming, self-loving way. No deprivation or punishment but a pro-active approach toward my own health. It’s been good.
Hey there. I'm Ariel Meadow Stallings, a native Seattleite who's written my way up and down the Left Coast. Electrolicious is where I post daily randomata, but I also write for a living. My first book, Offbeat Bride, was published last year.
You're reading a page from the archives. Check the homepage for current content.
laura
March 30th, 2006 at 2:20 am
Did you do the Flex plan or the Core plan? I’m impressed with your resolve. And you do look super svelte and healthy.
Jayme
March 30th, 2006 at 5:06 am
I actually noticed the weight loss and had a moment of wondering if I should say ‘Wow, you look great!’ but opted against it because quite frankly, you’ve always looked great. Now, you just looked svelt and great.
Lucy
March 30th, 2006 at 6:57 am
Thanks for sharing this, Ariel. As someone (a girlie feminst) who’s found herself in a similar position, this had me nodding my head and thinking and smiling.
Rebecca
March 30th, 2006 at 7:18 am
Congrats! I want to get back into working out and eating better, not for weight or look reasons but just to feel better day to day. And I hope it’s not an insult, but you do look fabulous!
Mary
March 30th, 2006 at 7:52 am
Congrats! I was wondering if you were doing WW due to the fact you mentioned how many points were in something that found its way into Mr. Bento. I’ve also been trying to lose weight without becoming obsessed and vapid (as I’ve done in the past.) You’re quite an inspiration!
josh
March 30th, 2006 at 7:55 am
That was a truly wonderful piece.
edie
March 30th, 2006 at 8:37 am
I don’t think you have to worry about your relationship with food - it sounds like it’s as healthy as an American woman’s could possibly be. Thanks for modeling this for the rest of us. I don’t own a scale and luckily my metabolism hasn’t hit that 30 something slump yet, and when it does I will remember the points you bring up. Every woman I know thinks about food and weight issues WAY too much, in my opinion. It starts when we’re kids and we’re given sweet snacks as rewards for being good.
Oh, and your favorite clothes might not fit anymore, but to me that says, “yeah! An excuse to buy new clothes!” Or make new ones out of your old ones. Fun! Clothing swap, anyone?
Empress
March 30th, 2006 at 8:42 am
I joined WW a little while ago - and I really liked the fact that yes, you could eat whatever you wanted - it was more about portion control… and it also kicked my butt into eating more fruits and veggies. You feel more healthy - and it is a boost when the clothes are just a bit more baggie… the article is a real motivator, because it’s not propaganda… but a real person, real life. Congrats
helenjane
March 30th, 2006 at 9:05 am
I also didn’t like WW’s weirdo dependence on all things fat-free and artificially flavored.
Congratulations you foxy, healthy woman you! Congratulations!
rosie
March 30th, 2006 at 10:36 am
Wow, did I write this? (sub WW for a nutritionist)
You look AWESOME
ROB
March 30th, 2006 at 11:03 am
Weight / food issues are not relegated solely to women (I’m personally going through a similar post 30 weight gain). Although the media and society at large do force unrealistic body image issues more upon women than men.
P.S. good use of ‘amenorrhea’
amy.leblanc
March 30th, 2006 at 11:18 am
great job! you do look fabulous, and i want your pants!
i have always hated the accusations of being a victim when i talk about how conscientious i am of my body, my diet, and my health. everyone assumes it must be some sort of disorder - while at the same time the “disorder” is marketed and deemed sexy, which is incredibly confusing and almost paralyzing for some women. it’s tied to the mixed messages we get about being sexy - BE sexy, because if you’re not you’ll be looked down upon, but don’t admit you’re trying to be sexy, because then you’re a whore. it’s great that you’ve gotten out of that place where caring about your body is not something you should be ashamed of - i think as national health issues rise, more and more feminists will support these kinds of programs. it’s certainly true among the african american community, i have noticed, that proudly being body-concious is seen as a sign of empowerment, not oppression.
DOUG.
March 30th, 2006 at 11:48 am
Another downside: Those “Wow, you look great” comments make you wonder just how crappy you must’ve looked before.
Vera
March 30th, 2006 at 12:04 pm
Woohoo! Thanks for sharing this, Ariel. It’s fascinating: It seems like you are/were on the opposite extreme of people who weigh themselves ten times a day. But the thing is that extremes are, well, extreme, so good for you for finding yourself somewhere in the middle again!
Also, I find it interesting that you have been so vehemently avoiding thinking about food at all. The thing is that during your cleanses you had to think about food A LOT, no? Of course thinking about food and thinking about food when you’re really thinking about the attractiveness of your body are two different things. But that distinction shows, I think, that the food/body concept was always in the back of your mind, no matter how hard you were trying NOT to think about it that way. So again, I’m so happy for you that you found a way to live in peace with that whole area of terrible confusion we’re all living with.
DOUG.
March 30th, 2006 at 12:19 pm
By the way, you look great!
Vera
March 30th, 2006 at 12:20 pm
DOUG.: NOT true. Every single one of us has said that Ariel has always looked great.
Ariel
March 30th, 2006 at 12:54 pm
Doug, although I know there are some people who have that reaction, I’m not one of them. I knew how I looked before (fine, but not as healthy as I wanted) and I know how I look now (fine, and a bit svelter). I’m not one to take compliments as veiled insults.
DOUG.
March 30th, 2006 at 1:25 pm
Ariel, you are a stronger woman than I.
erin
March 30th, 2006 at 1:27 pm
i really like the approach that your mom took with weight, food, & body issues. i myself have been trying to recover from the constant pressure of my mom trying to be thinner & her promptings for me to be thinner. happiness has always depended on whether the size smaller jeans fit yet. i am not a thin person. i don’t have a thin build. i look back at pictures of me in highschool & remember how fat i thought i was. now, since i’ve recently had a baby & am recovering for my total lack of control for 9 months, i look at those pictures & hope i can get back into those size 12’s. i hope, that if i ever have a daughter i can be a better example of healthy eating. it’s a struggle for me, but i want to do it, not for my pant size, but for my health.
Harry
March 30th, 2006 at 1:40 pm
My roommate has been on WW for the past 6 months or so, and while I wouldn’t call her a capital F Feminist like you or Alice Tiara or someone like that she certainly has the mindset of most professional coastel dwelling women. While she loved the program and it’s reall worked for her, her biggest beef was that it sometimes seemed more designed for middle aged housewife types than young, often eating on the go, city girls. She wan’t to make a “hipster weight watcher” web page of some kind.
Ariel
March 30th, 2006 at 1:43 pm
Harry, your roommate should get in touch with me. Her idea is BRILLIANT.
heather
March 30th, 2006 at 3:17 pm
I went to the meetings for awhile last year, and I stopped going because the meetings and the people were so damned annoying. I’d instantly sign up for a hipster version. But I think I’m going to sign up for the online WW. I need a bit of help.
Heather
March 30th, 2006 at 3:37 pm
Yay, Ariel! I’m so glad I called you out on your shit. You should flaunt it! And who says it’s not feminist to want to look hot while fighting patriarchy?!
xo,
Heather Spring
el
March 30th, 2006 at 7:40 pm
You look great. Really…that tummy…
I did WWonline also a few years ago. After some of the same reality checking you talk about. What I found really early on was that my idea of what was a reasonable portion had gotten WAY out of hand. I think I was trying to keep up with my taller, more solidly built husband. When I realized, and accepted, that I was eating about 50% more than I needed, the weight came off and stayed off. And…sorry size 16 jeans….not sorry to see you go!
xaotica
March 31st, 2006 at 2:15 pm
wow, this was really interesting for me to read because i have the same philosophical back-and-forth about weight loss issues. it’s hard for me to think about food without thinking about me thinking about it in this endless meta loop.
Meesha
March 31st, 2006 at 8:27 pm
When I first started to gain weight I felt great–after being “between sizes” for so long, finally I was a solid size! Clothes fit, and I had those great curves! But then my new clothes started to get snug, and I just couldn’t seem to stop the upward trend. And I still feel guilty for feeling like I should lose some weight, even though my doctor has pointed out that I’m outside a healthy range for my height.
It’s encouraging to read your essay and the comments–clearly a lot of us are stuggling with this.
Ivy
April 2nd, 2006 at 10:27 am
yes! I know exaclty what you mean. That’s how my family raised me - we never had a scale, fat is a feminist issue, etc. I’ve been struggling with this as well, lately ( just hit 30 and my metabolism may be slowing). I just joined a gym- that was huge for me. Yoga doesn’t seem counter-feminist, but to me a gym did. I still have moments on the treadmill where Ihave to check in with myself about what I’m doing and why I;m doing it. A lot of people who posted wee way to reductionist. Damn hipster feminism! One lady wrote about “being sexy”. Um honey, you can be sexy at a 12 or a 2. The struggle is that to women who were raised like us, these programs and dieting are a tool of oppression. Any kind of body consciousness is giving into the man (and men), is conforming to Anna Wintour. There are so many issues tied to our bodies! How bid did Naomi Wolf say the weight loss industry was? That being said, want to feel my pilates abs?
Ariel
April 2nd, 2006 at 11:16 am
The struggle is that to women who were raised like us, these programs and dieting are a tool of oppression.
That’s exactly it!
Jo
April 3rd, 2006 at 8:46 am
You know, an interesting thought I had about weight that I noticed last year. I now tend to loss weight in the Spring and I think I attribute it to once the Farmer’s Markets are open I get supper yummy tasting food that doesn’t need any sauces are anything. I wonder how much of current weight problems is food that is good for you at the supermarkets has no taste!?! Even food from organic sections of stores does not taste nearly as good as the farmer’s market food.
I am 31 and have similar metabolism issues. I have discovered by walking 2-4 miles a day, doing yoga and eating lots of fruits and veggies without a lot of elaborate sauces (Thai, Indian, Chinese, etc.) I can stay at a healthy weight. Not to say I don’t occassionaly splurge - I am hardly a saint - or lay in bed all day for that matter. But it’s what you do over the long haul.
By the way, Ariel, love your sight. Discovered hooping a few months ago and this place along with it.
Cara
April 4th, 2006 at 11:06 am
Ariel - I love LOVE love this post. I know exactly what you mean. When you write something like this, it does open the floodgates of comments from all types. However, you really put a realistic view on weight loss. I am also a fellow weightwatcher. I hit lifetime 2 years back and of course I’m struggling to lose my last 7lbs. It’s always a challenge.
Keep up the good work. Love your blog, I read it all the time
Cara
jcricket
August 30th, 2006 at 3:59 pm
Ariel,
I certainly commend you for the realistic look at yourself and for realizing that being at a healthy weight is not a betrayal of feminism. However, I can’t help but sense a bit of “Seattle hipster disdain” for all those “suburban housewives” and their oh-so-not-trendy clothing and food choices.
Their weight struggles are just as worthwhile as yours. Perhaps if you went to the meetings you might learn something from those women. My wife (a Seattle area hipster, on-the-go, etc.) certainly did, and feels richer for the experience, despite not feeling any deep sense of camraderie.
There’s a big wide world of people out there, beyond the vegetarian/yoga/REI nexus, and being so dismissive of those people’s choices is pretty lame and close-minded.
Perhaps rather than having a “hipster” version of WW, hipsters should try to ingratiate themselves with everyone else and share some of their wisdom.
Ariel
August 30th, 2006 at 4:09 pm
Great points, jcricket. Thanks for taking the time to comment.
However, I’m a bit confused by your comment. I didn’t say anything about suburban housewives or clothing in my post at all. You put the words in quotes as if to suggest that I somehow slammed this group of people and was “dismissive of their choices.”
I’m not sure how I was being dismissive of anybody when I said that I decided to do WW online because “I was told by a friend of a friend that she found the meetings not especially helpful for people who eat foods like quinoa and tempeh.”
Tempeh isn’t a hipster thing (the word hipster was mentioned by Harry, a New Yorker — not me), but rather a hippie/natural foods thing … something that WW makes clear through their program materials isn’t a priority in their diet plan.
I wasn’t being dismissive of the people who find the meetings useful. I heard stories of meeting leaders not knowing much about the foods I typically eat, so I made the choice not to attend the meetings. No judgement there other than to say “Why pay for meetings where I may not be able to get the information I’m looking for?”
jcricket
August 31st, 2006 at 4:16 pm
Fair enough, perhaps I was reacting more to the comments. There are, btw, more to meetings than just the food offerings. Being outside your comfort zone (which we all exist in hanging out with our chosen friends) can be a revealing experience. If nothing else, it can make you feel good about your progress (you probably have a lot less weight to lose than most on WW, and made better progress since you’re so focused).
Part of what I reacted to in your original post ws that you use the terms “chemically fake blecch”, “rarely touch fast foods”, “my diet is infinitely better than the average…” - to me that smacks (smells? hints?) at a disdain for the average American (read: suburban housewife in WW), who still probably eats a different diet while/after on WW than you. Despite all these “Seattle hippie/natural bona-fides” you gained 20 lbs over 4 years, which, imho, is pretty bad for something that’s “infinitely healthier”. Obviously figured this out and took steps to correct it, but I feel I have to point out that no diet is “infinitely healthier” when you end up gaining 20 lbs on it, no matter what the ingredients. And who knows what your other, equally important, health measurements are (e.g.resting heart rate, BMR, cholesterol, bloog pressure). From the medical literature I’ve read, oily ethnic foods, diets high in carbohydrates and cheese (all vegetarian staples) can be nearly (but not quite) as bad for you as many pieces of standard American fare. Again, you’re obviously tons better off than someone who is 100 or 200 lbs overweight, but I think there’s a triumphalism in the “I’m a vegetarian and do yoga, so I start off more healthy” that’s undeserved.
For a lot of the women in WW, the food options like Splenda are the ways they make their diet work within their family structure. From what I’ve heard from my wife, most of these women have the double-burden of learning to alter their own diet while continuing to cook for their families.
Again, I understand that you believe that being a vegetarian, eating whole or ethnic foods is inherently healthier than eating meat, drinking diet coke and using splenda in your coffee or to bake . There’s probably nothing I could say that would convince you otherwise, but I just don’t think the evidence for that is as strong as you think. For instance, I’ve read your blog long enough to know you believe that “cleanses” are healthful/helpful, when every piece of evidence I’ve read shows exactly the opposite (i.e. fecal matter is not impacted, that is not what you see being flushed out, no parasites are in there, etc.). I’m sure you personally felt better, but reading your description of what was supposedly happening doesn’t convince me that you understand human anatomy and physiology all that much better than the average American.
So, to me, your level of “healthiness” and food/health knowledge actually started off just slightly better than most Americans, but not as good as you think. Essentially - you perceive yourself as far healthier than you are (like most of us), but you just come at it from a community where you believe the connection to the “natural” items in your life/diet give you a higher plane to start from.
jcricket
September 1st, 2006 at 8:03 am
I just re-read my last post and it came across as unduly harsh (and too long), which is my fault) I’m not trying to make some huge point. Your post was great (seriously), I understand how sacred cows can get in the way of making personal progress. Taking responsibility for your own health is super-important (and something that will serve you well the rest of your life) and you’re clearly modeling good behavior for all your readers.
My tiny point was just that while you’re on the “healthy eating” re-evaluating tip you think about how you judge other people’s diets and maybe think about some other aspects of your own. I’m not suggesting you start eating hamburgers or drop the tabhouli from your diet, just that you maybe, just a little, come across as if you are “superior” to the average American.
And while we’re on that subject, I’m sure I do the same on other things, and I’m sure my “superiority complex” isn’t that becoming
Lydia
November 1st, 2006 at 11:14 am
I’ve just started using myfooddiary.com and I’m loving it. $9 a month for their online tools which let you track calories and nutritional info for everything you eat (they have a huge database), track your weight and measurements, track how much you exercise, and get you access to their active forums. It’s very straightforward, informational, and easy to use. I’ve learned a lot and made a few changes in my life which have resulted in losing almost a pound a week (and I already had a pretty good veggie diet).
Just thought I’d mention it here since it is based on the same philosophy as weight watchers seems to be (lifestyle changes you can live with for life without negative attitudes about food), but it’s not bogged down with the cheesiness factor. Plus it’s cheaper.
rsdio
November 5th, 2006 at 5:31 pm
Excellent story!
A male friend of mine just went through the same thing. The only differences that gender introduced was that he probably did not have nearly the same level of socially-induced psychological trauma about having gained so much weight over time, and I’m sure that’s a relief. However, the flip side of the coin is that nobody really thinks twice about an overweight man with a belly - it’s accepted in our society. That makes it even harder to conjure up the motivation to reach a healthy weight. Especially when that isn’t such an easy task.
But the fact is that we evolved in harder times. We had to walk (or run!) everywhere, and each meal had to be obtained by hard work, often at risk to our lives. Meat was a smaller part of the diet simply because it was more difficult to obtain than fruits or veggies. In modern times, just about everything we do or can imagine is easier. Is it so terrible that the price of all this “ease” is that perhaps we’ll have to put a lot of thought and conscious effort into measuring the proportions of our food intake, so that we don’t overeat simply because there’s nothing stopping us?
Dogeatdog
May 3rd, 2007 at 1:19 pm
Good for you. You are lucky it worked so well. I had ovarian cancer and went through menopause at age 39 and gained about 60lbs. I was too skinny to start with. I tried WW which scared the shit out of me that I would have to do something like that when I had always been 105 lbs. It was too oriented to package, processed and chemical foods for someone who always ate beans and rice and lots of other grains. I would get really angry that one of those WW bars would be less points then a pear. I would be interested to hear what you did, because for me it is just not working.
Electrolicious» Blog Archive » Writing FAQ: Blogging & Privacy
October 25th, 2007 at 8:36 am
[...] FAQ: 5 copywriting tipsWriting FAQ: Networking & BloggingAll-knowing fatherly assShopping OlderFat is a feminist issueDisgusting American FoodsSeasonale™What would NPH do?Things are going to be a bit messy around [...]
sarahd
November 8th, 2007 at 6:02 pm
wow, thank you for this… I can’t tell you how much it speaks to me. SO nice to be able to put words to what’s been muddling about inside in my head for the past couple of years. Maybe now I can finally make some sense of it (the muddle) and make the kind of progress you have done!
Rebecca
June 24th, 2008 at 1:04 pm
Thank you. This is just so damned sensible.