<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Dieting Anti-Feminist?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://electrolicious.com/2006/11/is_dieting_antifemin/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://electrolicious.com/2006/11/is_dieting_antifemin</link>
	<description>Daily affirmations of a word mercenary</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: alphabitch</title>
		<link>http://electrolicious.com/2006/11/is_dieting_antifemin#comment-7250</link>
		<dc:creator>alphabitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 16:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7250</guid>
		<description>Maven:  duct tape really is an effective depilatory, plus you can feel really butch about it.  I'm not even kidding.  Much less messy and smelly than any other I've tried.  Plus cheaper!  Not so great for leg hair though, as you need to use a lot of tape.  But it does work on the legs, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maven:  duct tape really is an effective depilatory, plus you can feel really butch about it.  I&#8217;m not even kidding.  Much less messy and smelly than any other I&#8217;ve tried.  Plus cheaper!  Not so great for leg hair though, as you need to use a lot of tape.  But it does work on the legs, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esther</title>
		<link>http://electrolicious.com/2006/11/is_dieting_antifemin#comment-7243</link>
		<dc:creator>Esther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 00:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7243</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/29/weekinreview/29kolata.html"&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; in the New York Times also talks about fat stigmatization. I thought it was funny how some people took the you working a sedentary job sentence and ran with it to assume you never once get aerobic exercise (even though you specifically said you do yoga daily).  although I know I've been guilty of it in the past, saying that fat people don't get enough exercise is just stupid. I know plenty of skinny people who don't get enough exercise, but have genes that prevents them from getting that beer belly (though..they may well have one in another 10 years or so).  I think the problem everyone seems to have is conflating fitness (both in what you eat, and your level of exercise) with physical appearance, and that's part of what you try to address in the article. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/29/weekinreview/29kolata.html">this article</a> in the New York Times also talks about fat stigmatization. I thought it was funny how some people took the you working a sedentary job sentence and ran with it to assume you never once get aerobic exercise (even though you specifically said you do yoga daily).  although I know I&#8217;ve been guilty of it in the past, saying that fat people don&#8217;t get enough exercise is just stupid. I know plenty of skinny people who don&#8217;t get enough exercise, but have genes that prevents them from getting that beer belly (though..they may well have one in another 10 years or so).  I think the problem everyone seems to have is conflating fitness (both in what you eat, and your level of exercise) with physical appearance, and that&#8217;s part of what you try to address in the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaylyn</title>
		<link>http://electrolicious.com/2006/11/is_dieting_antifemin#comment-7240</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaylyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 05:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7240</guid>
		<description>Hi Ariel, Your article was the first I've read on Alter Net, and I was *shocked* at the negative attacks from their readers. The level of criticism was completely unwarranted. I thought it was a thought provoking essay, and as a 30-something person doing office work, I see where you were coming from. I didn't think you were tyring to change to world, just sharing an experience and some realizations that helped you move in a good direction. Nicely done. Don't listen to the bitter ones. They need to settle down already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ariel, Your article was the first I&#8217;ve read on Alter Net, and I was *shocked* at the negative attacks from their readers. The level of criticism was completely unwarranted. I thought it was a thought provoking essay, and as a 30-something person doing office work, I see where you were coming from. I didn&#8217;t think you were tyring to change to world, just sharing an experience and some realizations that helped you move in a good direction. Nicely done. Don&#8217;t listen to the bitter ones. They need to settle down already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ariel</title>
		<link>http://electrolicious.com/2006/11/is_dieting_antifemin#comment-7238</link>
		<dc:creator>Ariel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 03:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7238</guid>
		<description>Amy, Sirens has a syndication deal with Alternet ... I wish I'd known!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amy, Sirens has a syndication deal with Alternet &#8230; I wish I&#8217;d known!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amy.leblanc</title>
		<link>http://electrolicious.com/2006/11/is_dieting_antifemin#comment-7239</link>
		<dc:creator>amy.leblanc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 20:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7239</guid>
		<description>this is why i try to avoid ever using the word "feminist" unless i'm claiming i'm not one.  it's lost all historical meaning in the modern world, and since it's impossible to redefine words without drudging up the previous connotations, which always means bitter debate, so i just don't use it.

i've send your post to several of my friends struggling with weight issues, and they all enjoyed how honest it is.  so what that it's not "deep"?  this is a BLOG, not Scientific American.  context, people, context.  

and i have a Q about web rules:  how is it that Alternet can just republish your words without contacting you? just because they provide the link?  don't you have a copyright on here somewhere? or is it because it was published in that other mag first?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is why i try to avoid ever using the word &#8220;feminist&#8221; unless i&#8217;m claiming i&#8217;m not one.  it&#8217;s lost all historical meaning in the modern world, and since it&#8217;s impossible to redefine words without drudging up the previous connotations, which always means bitter debate, so i just don&#8217;t use it.</p>
<p>i&#8217;ve send your post to several of my friends struggling with weight issues, and they all enjoyed how honest it is.  so what that it&#8217;s not &#8220;deep&#8221;?  this is a BLOG, not Scientific American.  context, people, context.  </p>
<p>and i have a Q about web rules:  how is it that Alternet can just republish your words without contacting you? just because they provide the link?  don&#8217;t you have a copyright on here somewhere? or is it because it was published in that other mag first?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
