<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Odd Child</title>
	<atom:link href="http://electrolicious.com/2007/10/odd_child/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://electrolicious.com/2007/10/odd_child</link>
	<description>Daily affirmations of a word mercenary</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 01:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jcricket</title>
		<link>http://electrolicious.com/2007/10/odd_child#comment-8455</link>
		<dc:creator>jcricket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8455</guid>
		<description>At least your name is ariel, so you can always claim to be "on topic" :-)

My conclusion, after about 20 years in the IT industry, is that I think there are a small number of personal info tools that actually enrich life, and a large number that give the illusion of doing so while mainly serving to provide more diversion from stuff that really matters. 

The same people that wouldn't be "caught dead" watching 3-4 hours of TV per day spend at least that much time twittering, facebooking, surfing wikipedia/youtube and reading RSS feeds of people they'll never meet (although now that ariel lives in my hood, I suppose that might change).

The book "Bowling Alone" makes some pretty good arguments about how being more individualistic has led to less connectedness. There's some weird irony in that we're more "connected" now than ever (always-on Internet, mobile phones that people can reach us on any time of the day or night, etc.) and yet also less connected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least your name is ariel, so you can always claim to be &#8220;on topic&#8221; <img src='http://electrolicious.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
My conclusion, after about 20 years in the IT industry, is that I think there are a small number of personal info tools that actually enrich life, and a large number that give the illusion of doing so while mainly serving to provide more diversion from stuff that really matters. </p>
<p>The same people that wouldn&#8217;t be &#8220;caught dead&#8221; watching 3-4 hours of TV per day spend at least that much time twittering, facebooking, surfing wikipedia/youtube and reading RSS feeds of people they&#8217;ll never meet (although now that ariel lives in my hood, I suppose that might change).</p>
<p>The book &#8220;Bowling Alone&#8221; makes some pretty good arguments about how being more individualistic has led to less connectedness. There&#8217;s some weird irony in that we&#8217;re more &#8220;connected&#8221; now than ever (always-on Internet, mobile phones that people can reach us on any time of the day or night, etc.) and yet also less connected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arielmeow</title>
		<link>http://electrolicious.com/2007/10/odd_child#comment-8452</link>
		<dc:creator>Arielmeow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 20:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8452</guid>
		<description>Hi jcricket - not to sabotage Ariel's blog for my own conversation... but point well taken. In my own life I get away from the chatter as much as possible, as long as possible -  but it's easier for some folks than others depending on work and other life factors.

I work in the information industry (I am a user experience architect) and the reason I do the work I do is not because I love technology and information saturation.  It is because I think these things are totally useful if we design them right, and if the way we put them out in the world asks us to use them in ways that are more human,  less fragmented.  I think we can bake this into product design.

I also think some of my information tools really enrich my life and save me time so I can get to the more important things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi jcricket - not to sabotage Ariel&#8217;s blog for my own conversation&#8230; but point well taken. In my own life I get away from the chatter as much as possible, as long as possible -  but it&#8217;s easier for some folks than others depending on work and other life factors.</p>
<p>I work in the information industry (I am a user experience architect) and the reason I do the work I do is not because I love technology and information saturation.  It is because I think these things are totally useful if we design them right, and if the way we put them out in the world asks us to use them in ways that are more human,  less fragmented.  I think we can bake this into product design.</p>
<p>I also think some of my information tools really enrich my life and save me time so I can get to the more important things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcricket</title>
		<link>http://electrolicious.com/2007/10/odd_child#comment-8453</link>
		<dc:creator>jcricket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 17:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8453</guid>
		<description>Smart thinking (walking the dog, turning off the sidekick). My comment was directed more at the "other" ariel who commented that we can use "info tools" to manage information overload. Methinks those tools are unnecessary.  

Just shut stuff off. Don't respond to every email/text as you get them. Don't answer the cell phone if you're otherwise occupied. Don't bring the laptop to the meeting. It's all pretty simple. Single-tasking is severely under-rated.  

Or, as &lt;a href="http://www.zeldman.com/2007/09/18/facebook-considered-harmless/"&gt;this post about all the new web 2.0 social networking tools&lt;/A&gt; puts it: 

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;I&gt;The real reason, of course, for all this stuff, is that it provides a way to blow off work you should be doing, while creating the illusion that you are achieving something. At least in most offices, you canï¿½t masturbate at your desk. But you can Tweet.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smart thinking (walking the dog, turning off the sidekick). My comment was directed more at the &#8220;other&#8221; ariel who commented that we can use &#8220;info tools&#8221; to manage information overload. Methinks those tools are unnecessary.  </p>
<p>Just shut stuff off. Don&#8217;t respond to every email/text as you get them. Don&#8217;t answer the cell phone if you&#8217;re otherwise occupied. Don&#8217;t bring the laptop to the meeting. It&#8217;s all pretty simple. Single-tasking is severely under-rated.  </p>
<p>Or, as <a href="http://www.zeldman.com/2007/09/18/facebook-considered-harmless/">this post about all the new web 2.0 social networking tools</a> puts it: </p>
<blockquote><p><i>The real reason, of course, for all this stuff, is that it provides a way to blow off work you should be doing, while creating the illusion that you are achieving something. At least in most offices, you canï¿½t masturbate at your desk. But you can Tweet.</i></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ariel</title>
		<link>http://electrolicious.com/2007/10/odd_child#comment-8454</link>
		<dc:creator>Ariel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 16:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8454</guid>
		<description>jcricket, that's actually exactly what I did. I got home from the airport, turned off my Sidekick, and took the dog for a nice long walk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jcricket, that&#8217;s actually exactly what I did. I got home from the airport, turned off my Sidekick, and took the dog for a nice long walk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WeddingSavvy</title>
		<link>http://electrolicious.com/2007/10/odd_child#comment-8448</link>
		<dc:creator>WeddingSavvy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 20:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8448</guid>
		<description>Love your Auntie!
I love the older crowd.
Odd Child =Odd Adult!
Be proud!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love your Auntie!<br />
I love the older crowd.<br />
Odd Child =Odd Adult!<br />
Be proud!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
