<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exposed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://electrolicious.com/2008/05/emily-gould/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://electrolicious.com/2008/05/emily-gould</link>
	<description>Daily affirmations of a word mercenary</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: no black ink. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; puerile.</title>
		<link>http://electrolicious.com/2008/05/emily-gould#comment-11871</link>
		<dc:creator>no black ink. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; puerile.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electrolicious.com/2008/05/exposed#comment-11871</guid>
		<description>[...] the blogosphere was all abuzz over this story from the New York Times magazine (see here, here, and here, for starters), revealing former Gawker editor Emily Gould to be as petty, self-absorbed/involved, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the blogosphere was all abuzz over this story from the New York Times magazine (see here, here, and here, for starters), revealing former Gawker editor Emily Gould to be as petty, self-absorbed/involved, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S of 52 Faces</title>
		<link>http://electrolicious.com/2008/05/emily-gould#comment-11840</link>
		<dc:creator>S of 52 Faces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 22:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electrolicious.com/2008/05/exposed#comment-11840</guid>
		<description>I hate what she stands for...but only because I'm slightly jealous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate what she stands for&#8230;but only because I&#8217;m slightly jealous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SolShine7</title>
		<link>http://electrolicious.com/2008/05/emily-gould#comment-11448</link>
		<dc:creator>SolShine7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 22:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electrolicious.com/2008/05/exposed#comment-11448</guid>
		<description>The Internet is really changing things. Thanks for the link to the article and sharing your thoughts on it. It makes you pause and think about the whole blogging scene.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Internet is really changing things. Thanks for the link to the article and sharing your thoughts on it. It makes you pause and think about the whole blogging scene.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Mernit</title>
		<link>http://electrolicious.com/2008/05/emily-gould#comment-11415</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Mernit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 18:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electrolicious.com/2008/05/exposed#comment-11415</guid>
		<description>Ariel--this is a great post! I learned alot from it, and from some of the commentators--thanks for such wise insights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ariel&#8211;this is a great post! I learned alot from it, and from some of the commentators&#8211;thanks for such wise insights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://electrolicious.com/2008/05/emily-gould#comment-11409</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 23:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electrolicious.com/2008/05/exposed#comment-11409</guid>
		<description>Amy (and Brittney, in retrospect): fair enough. It would probably have been more accurate if I had said "if he had instead dedicated himself *solely* to bitching about how fat, drunk and/or ugly he thought everybody was."

Kirsten: I kept hoping she'd show some measure of lucidity to the cause/effects of her situation.  That's one of the most frustrating things about her behavior - at the conclusion of the article, she remains stuck on the idea that it was the *act* of 'oversharing' that led to her hardships, rather than a measure of the sorts of things she chose to share, and her intentions behind sharing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amy (and Brittney, in retrospect): fair enough. It would probably have been more accurate if I had said &#8220;if he had instead dedicated himself *solely* to bitching about how fat, drunk and/or ugly he thought everybody was.&#8221;</p>
<p>Kirsten: I kept hoping she&#8217;d show some measure of lucidity to the cause/effects of her situation.  That&#8217;s one of the most frustrating things about her behavior - at the conclusion of the article, she remains stuck on the idea that it was the *act* of &#8216;oversharing&#8217; that led to her hardships, rather than a measure of the sorts of things she chose to share, and her intentions behind sharing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
